AD ANTONY DRAPERADVISORYTake the free Assessment
A pattern to investigate. · Direction

Testing whether priorities depend on the founder

A written strategy does not establish shared direction. Look at whether managers can independently name current priorities and make similar trade-offs when demands compete.

Look at the evidence

  1. Ask managers separately for the top three current priorities.

  2. Compare their answers with actual time and resource allocation.

  3. Review a recent trade-off made without the founder.

Illustrative example

A case to think through

Sales pursues urgent new work while delivery protects an existing promise. Both may have reasonable local goals, revealing an unresolved business-level priority.

This is a hypothetical operating example, not a client result.

Avoid a misleading conclusion

Agreement in a leadership meeting may conceal different interpretations once managers return to their teams.

Direction concerns shared priorities and the ability to make trade-offs. Compare what people say with where time and resources actually go. A clear document is helpful, but the stronger evidence is a real choice made coherently when competing demands arrive without the founder supplying the answer.

Use a real case from your business

Your evidence check

Bring supporting and contrary examples. A self-reported answer is a starting point; these notes do not calculate or validate a score.

PromptNotes from your case
Priority stated
work receiving resources
conflict
decision basis

Should all managers use identical wording?

No. Look for compatible choices and understanding, not memorised phrases.

Your next step

See the wider pattern.

20 questions. An indicative, self-reported result with a five-dimension profile and an optional conversation.

Take the free Assessment