AD ANTONY DRAPERADVISORYGet the free seven-day Plan
One decision. Clear ownership. · Handle exceptions

Reviewing repeated escalations

Repeated escalation of the same case type is evidence to investigate. It may reveal an unclear limit, inaccessible information, a capability gap or a genuinely recurring reserved decision.

Put it into practice

  1. Group recent escalations by decision type and cause.

  2. Check whether the same missing input appears repeatedly.

  3. Change one agreement or information source and compare the next cases.

Illustrative example

A case to think through

If every discount exception is missing margin information, supplying a reliable margin view may be more useful than telling sales to be more confident.

This is a hypothetical operating example, not a client result.

A boundary worth checking

Counting escalations without looking at their appropriateness can reward silence and punish sensible risk management.

An appropriate escalation can be evidence that the boundary works. Judge the reason, timing and outcome rather than seeking the lowest possible number of questions. Urgent safety, security and specialist incidents retain their established response routes; a general delegation exercise does not replace them.

Use a real case from your business

Your handover working notes

Use these prompts with the person taking ownership. Record the agreement within your existing permissions.

PromptNotes from your case
Case type
repeated gap
proposed change
next cases to review

Is fewer escalations always better?

No. Some should increase when previously hidden risks become visible. Review appropriateness and outcome, not volume alone.

Your next step

Give one decision a clear owner.

A free fillable PDF with a worked example and conversation prompts. Marketing updates are optional.

Get the free seven-day Plan